Most intimidating ground
The aid comes at a good time for the embattled Ukrainian President Poroshenko, whose approval rating hovers around 16 percent. In this case, it would seem that Russian-speaking Ukrainians simply don’t rate. Defense Secretary James Mattis, Poroshenko declared: “Our Ukrainian caravan is on a roll and we have one road to travel upon — a wide Euro-Atlantic highway, leading to membership in the European Union and NATO.” Ukraine’s Human Rights Abuses There are a number of objections to yet another round of NATO expansion.
In a bid to stave off the possibility of a far-right, Poroshenko is back to banging the war drums, promising, well, more blood. In addition to promising a wider war in the Donbas, Poroshenko has repeatedly promised that he will seek NATO membership. As I reported in February 2015: “The current [Ukrainian] government has, according to organizations that could hardly be described as Kremlin friendly (Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe), committed war crimes in its attempt to defeat the Russian-backed separatists in the Donbas. NATO’s principal consideration should not be whether NATO will make Ukraine more secure, but whether Ukraine will make NATO more secure.
S., Russia-hating liberals are joining the neocons in seeking more war in Ukraine, as the prospects for a rational and peaceful resolution to the crisis continue to fade, explains James W. In the presence of Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko, Graham told the soldiers: “Your fight is our fight … All of us will go back to Washington and we will push the case against Russia.” Mc Cain promised the assembled troops, “we will do everything we can to provide you with what you need to win.” When contemplating the long careers of the two Republican senators, it is hard to escape the conclusion that Mc George Bundy’s quip about the famed Cold War columnist Joe Alsop – that he had “never known him to go to any area where blood could be spilled that he didn’t come back and say more blood” – applies equally to Mc Cain and Graham.
Lindsey Graham, to a contingent of Ukrainian troops not far from the front line in eastern Ukraine.
Some compare Monsanto’s hard-line approach to Microsoft’s zealous efforts to protect its software from pirates.
At least with Microsoft the buyer of a program can use it over and over again.
Indeed, last month’s National Defense Authorization Act shows that – if nothing else – Mc Cain and Graham are as good as their word: the recently passed defense appropriations bill provides for 0 million, including “defensive lethal assistance” to Kiev, as part of a 0 billion overall spending package. 19, Poroshenko promised that “American weapons will help us liberate the Donbas and return Ukrainian territories.” He also noted that Ukraine spends roughly 6 percent of its GDP on defense, “a figure,” he observed, “much bigger than the obligation for the NATO members.” Clearly Washington’s condemnation of governments that wage war “against their own people” remains selective, contingent upon who is doing the killing and who is doing the dying.But instead of trying to implement the Minsk peace agreement (which calls for the Donbas to remain as part of Ukraine but with more autonomy from Kiev) or search for a reasonable alternative to what are indeed perplexing and pressing matters of national security, Poroshenko has continued to ring the alarm over the another, this time illusory, Russian invasion.In a recent speech before the Ukrainian parliament, Poroshenko claimed “there is more and more evidence for [Russia’s] preparations for an offensive war of continental proportions.” Yet perhaps the danger isn’t as clear and present as Poroshenko portrayed it. K.’s Independent has observed: “Nato itself had held exercises in the Black Sea and before that in and around the western borderlands of Ukraine. ” Indeed, if Russia was on the precipice of launching a land war in Eastern Europe, would it have cut its defense budget by 25 percent to billion a year, as was recently announced by the Kremlin?As Rinehart would recall, the man began verbally attacking him, saying he had proof that Rinehart had planted Monsanto’s genetically modified (G. Better come clean and settle with Monsanto, Rinehart says the man told him—or face the consequences. He owned a small—a small—country store in a town of 350 people. You will pay.”Scenes like this are playing out in many parts of rural America these days as Monsanto goes after farmers, farmers’ co-ops, seed dealers—anyone it suspects may have infringed its patents of genetically modified seeds.Rinehart was incredulous, listening to the words as puzzled customers and employees looked on. He was angry that somebody could just barge into the store and embarrass him in front of everyone. Rinehart says he told the intruder, “You got the wrong guy.”When the stranger persisted, Rinehart showed him the door. Rinehart says he can’t remember the exact words, but they were to the effect of: “Monsanto is big. As interviews and reams of court documents reveal, Monsanto relies on a shadowy army of private investigators and agents in the American heartland to strike fear into farm country.
Search for most intimidating ground:
As difficult as it might be for our hearty band on new cold warriors to believe (some of whom have scant knowledge about the topic of U.